What Does Ncc Stand For In Star Trek?

What Does Ncc Stand For In Star Trek

Why is Enterprise called NCC-1701?

Concept and initial design – Series creator Gene Roddenberry reviewed hundreds of science fiction magazines dating back to 1931 to gather ideas about what he wanted Star Trek ‘s main vessel to look like. Despite the research, he was more confident in what he did not want than what he did want. The first color rendering of the Enterprise design; soon after, Jefferies would realize the design into a small wooden model. Note the prototypical elements used in Enterprise redesigns, other franchise vessels named Enterprise, and numerous other Star Trek spacecraft: a disc-like primary hull, a pair of offset engine nacelles, and a cylindrical secondary hull.

  1. Roddenberry further specified that the ship would have a crew of 100–150 and be incredibly fast.
  2. Art director Pato Guzman ‘s assistant, Matt Jefferies, was responsible for designing the ship and several of its sets.
  3. Jefferies and Roddenberry did not want the vessel to look like any of the rocket ships already used by the aerospace industry or in popular culture; many designs were rejected for being “too conventional”.

To meet Roddenberry’s requirement that the ship look believable, Jefferies tried “to visualize what the fourth, fifth or tenth generation of present-day equipment would be like”. Jefferies’ experience with aviation let him imbue his designs with what he called “aircraft logic”.

He imagined the ship’s engines would be too powerful to be near the crew, requiring them to be set apart from the hull. Jefferies initially rejected a disk-shaped component, worried about the similarities to flying saucers ; however, a spherical module eventually flattened into a disk. During a visit to Jefferies, Roddenberry and NBC staff were drawn to a sketch of the ship resembling its final configuration.

Jefferies had created a small model of this design that, when held from a string, hung upside-down – an appearance he had to “unsell”. He kept the hull smooth, with a sense that the ship’s components were serviced from inside. He designed the Klingon starship seen in the third season by rearranging and changing the shape of Enterprise ‘ s basic modules: a main body, two engine pods, and a neck with a head on it.

Some of Jefferies’ rejected design concepts – such as spherical hull sections and warp engines that encircle a ship – inspired future Star Trek vessel designs. The Enterprise was originally named Yorktown, but Roddenberry was fascinated by the aircraft carrier Enterprise and had “always been proud of that ship and wanted to use the name.” The NCC-1701 registry stems from NC being one of the international aircraft registration codes assigned to the United States.

The second C was added because Soviet aircraft used C s, and Jefferies believed a venture into space would be a joint operation by the United States and Russia. Jefferies rejected 3, 6, 8, and 9 as “too easily confused” on screen; he eventually reasoned the Enterprise was the first vessel of Starfleet’s 17th starship design, hence 1701,

What does the USS stand for in USS Enterprise?

Multiple realities (covers information from several alternate timelines ) USS Enterprise USS was an identifying prefix used before the names of sea-faring ships on Earth and space-faring ships of United Earth and United Federation of Planets, The abbreviation has alternately stood for ” U nited S tates S hip “, ” U nited S pace S hip “, and ” U nited S tar S hip “.

What is the difference between NCC-1701 and NX 01?

USS Enterprise NCC-1701 (Star Trek: The Original Series – Star Trek III: The Search For Spock) – What Does Ncc Stand For In Star Trek Kirk’s two five-year missions between 2265 and 2280 are the stuff of Starfleet legend. Star Trek: Strange New Worlds ‘ season 1 finale confirmed that, without Captain James T. Kirk, the Federation would have become involved in a brutal war with the Romulan Star Empire.

  • Twenty years after the starship first launched, Kirk’s Enterprise showed no signs of its age as it conducted its two five-year missions, battling Romulans, Klingons, and encountering innumerable strange stellar phenomena.
  • Much larger than its predecessor, the NX-01, the Enterprise NCC-1701 also sported a massive saucer section and nacelles but featured a secondary hull that sat below the saucer for a less aerodynamic design.

Various refits throughout its lifetime updated the look of the ship, and by the events of the first Star Trek movie, the Enterprise had an updated interior. After Kirk, two other men captained the Enterprise 1701: Spock and the brief tenure of Willard Decker.

How many NCC-1701 are there?

If you count alternate timelines/universes, and refits which resulted in a different model being used to represent the same ship, there are 4 NCC-1701s and 2 NCC-1701-Ds, bringing the total to 12.

Why Enterprise is called D?

If memory serves, TNG was set 80 years after TOS. ‘A’ was unveiled just about 20 years after the era of NCC-1701 ‘no bloody A, B, C, or D’ (Scotty, TNG:’Relics’). This suggests about a 20 year service life for a ‘top of the line’ starship. Simple arithmetic then makes ‘D’ the plausible choice for TNG’s Enterprise.

How fast is warp 1?

The universe is big. Like, really big. Bigger, even, than several IKEAs strung end to end, if you can believe it. It’s so big that just getting to the Moon, which seems so close sometimes you feel like you could reach out and grab it, takes a few days. Getting to Mars, our best candidate for setting boots on another world, is an even worse prospect.

The numbers get a little wiggly, owing to the constant movement of the two involved planets, but a crewed trip to Mars, using current technology, would take about nine months, That’s quite a road trip. The point is, there’s a whole lot of space out there and getting anywhere interesting takes way too long.

We are a society hell-bent on immediate gratification. It’s why instant noodles exist. Science fiction writers have imagined all sorts of solutions for this specific problem. Waiting decades or centuries for our protagonists to arrive on another world can make for stagnant storytelling, so we’ve dreamed up hyper-drives and subspace tunneling.

Perhaps most famous among these fictional solutions is Star Trek ‘s warp drive. In the 23rd and 24th centuries, traveling to the edges of the cosmos is as simple as pushing a button, presuming you’ve got a well-stocked store of dilithium crystals. The enlisted members of Starfleet enjoy spacecraft capable not only of moving at a significant fraction of light speed but of dispensing with this universal constant altogether.

Who needs relativity, anyway? It makes for better storytelling. The various crews of Trek ‘s slate of television shows and movies can get from here to there without much fanfare. Seeking out new worlds and new civilizations is no more difficult than gassing up the car and packing a cooler full of junk food.

And they don’t even need to do that! The replicators will crank out a bologna sandwich just like mom used to make. All that’s left is to go, but what happens then? Say goodbye to your friends and family, we’re about to explore the cost of traveling at warp speeds. THE UNSEEN IMPLICATIONS OF FASTER-THAN-LIGHT TRAVEL The crews of our favorite Star Trek shows regularly travel at velocities far outpacing the speed of light.

Warp one, a veritable snail’s pace in the world of Trek, is equal to the speed of light. Warp speeds exceeding warp one equal a multiple of C (the speed of light), but the exact speeds are variable, depending on the source material. It seems the Federation altered its scale as time went on.

Still, the fact of the matter is, our favorite Starfleet crews regularly traveled well beyond the speed of light as they whizzed between one planet and another. In order to understand the implications of this type of space travel, we first have to have a basic understanding of relativity. Previous to Einstein, the common belief was that time was constant, experienced by all observers, in all places, in the same way, and at the same rate.

The trouble began when physicists realized that the speed of light is constant, regardless of the velocity of the observer. This differed from the way we experience velocities of pretty much anything else. For instance, if a cannon fires a cannonball at 100 miles per hour, from atop a moving train also moving at 100 miles per hour, in the same direction, the total velocity of the cannonball is 200 miles per hour.

This sort of relationship makes logical sense from our everyday perspective. But this same relationship does not apply to light. Light shone from a stationary flashlight travels across space at 299,792,458 meters per second. If we were to strap that flashlight to the top of that same moving train traveling at 100 miles per hour (or 44.704 meters per second), the speed at which the light would travel remains at 299,792,458 meters per second.

There is no apparent change to the light’s total speed. Where things get weird is when we realize that the apparent speed remains constant both for someone standing on the train and a stationary person standing on the platform. No matter your perspective and against all common wisdom, the speed of light remains the same.

Einstein realized that the only way to reconcile these two divergent experiences was to modify the experience of time. In order for the speed of light to remain constant, the person traveling at faster speeds has to experience time more slowly. While it might seem counterintuitive, this conclusion is born of real-world experience.

You might be interested:  What Does The Easter Bunny Have To Do With Jesus?

Astronauts living on the International Space Station experience time at a slower rate than their counterparts here on Earth. Their speed, while impressive (4.76 miles per second), is slow when compared to the speed of light. As such, the time dilation they experience is minimal.

  • Astronaut Scott Kelly spent a year on ISS, while his twin brother stayed here at home.
  • After a year at those speeds, he would have aged about 0.01 second less than his brother.
  • It’s something, but they can still celebrate birthdays together without any trouble.
  • Things get weirder when you get nearer to the speed of light.

The closer you get to the speed of light, the slower time moves for you. Time remains at the usual rate for the people back here on Earth. If you were able to travel to Alpha Centauri, roughly 4.25 light years away, at 99.9 percent the speed of light, you’d be able to see the time dilation more clearly.

  1. The trip would seem, from the perspective of an observer on Earth, to take a little more than 4.25 years.
  2. For someone on the ship, however, the travel time would be a little more than five days.
  3. They could travel there, do a bit of research, and come back in less than a fortnight.
  4. But everyone here at home would have aged more than eight years.

Star Trek avoids all this trouble through a whole lot of hand-waving about warping spacetime. It’s not an entirely unfounded idea. In 1994, physicist Miguel Alcubierre proposed the possibility of bending spacetime around an object. By condensing the space ahead of a craft and inflating the space behind, you could create a bubble within which a craft could travel without violating relativity.

The upshot is that anyone inside could travel effectively faster than the speed of light without experiencing any time dilation. In scientific circles, that’s referred to as getting to have your cake and eat it, too. That’s all a little too clean for our tastes. If we’ve learned anything from the universe, it’s that it doesn’t like to make things easy for us.

So let’s assume we’re at the mercy of relativism, just for fun. THE COST OF THE ENTERPRISE We’ve already discussed the implications of moving at a significant fraction of C. You can pretty much say goodbye to any relationships you have at home as soon as you sign on to a Starfleet ship.

After just a couple of trips to nearby stars, everyone you know and love will be dead while you haven’t even been at work long enough to collect benefit time. Things get even weirder when your captain calls down to engineering to kick in the juice. Once you’re traveling faster than warp one, things get totally bizarre.

The speed of light has an intrinsic relationship with causality. Once you go beyond it, the past, present, and future get a little wibbly-wobbly, We won’t get into the mathematical weeds here. If you want a moderately simple explanation, check out the below video from PBS, but suffice it to say that once you get sufficiently beyond the speed of light, time goes totally out the window.

It’s possible, at least hypothetically, once you’re traveling at post-light speeds, to travel backward in time. There was some controversy about this a few years ago when, for a brief moment, scientists thought they might have observed superluminal neutrinos, In common terms, they thought they might have seen particles appearing before they were expected.

Eventually, it was determined that there were mechanical errors that resulted in inaccurate findings. Still, the math checks out. If you move faster than the speed of light, it’s theoretically possible to travel through spacetime and arrive at a point prior to when you began.

Even if you somehow convince your captain to avoid the warp drive and use only the impulse engines, time dilation will have your family and friends dying off before you get your first chance at shore leave. The terrifying conclusion is, once you sign up for Starfleet, the best-case scenario is you get a couple of phone calls to those you’ve left behind.

Worst case, you arrive back home before anyone you know has even been born. If time is the only true currency, exploring the cosmos exacts a terrible cost. The universe is vast, and there are so many sights to see; it’s unfortunate that physics seems to have conspired to exact a heavy toll in order to see them.

How fast is Warp 9 in Star Trek?

Star Trek: The Next Generation – A document dated May 14, 1986 and attributed to Gene Roddenberry places warp 10 at the top of the scale: “Beyond that time-space continuity is disoperative.” The corresponding velocity is given as “the speed of light multiplied by the speed of light ten times”, whereas warp 2 is now “the speed of light squared”, implying a general rule of the speed of light to the power of the warp factor.

  • Aside from warp 1 mapping to the speed of light, it is unclear how this was to be applied in practice.
  • There is, however, a clue in the statement that only 34% of the galaxy has been explored as opposed to 18% in TOS, suggesting improvements without major breakthroughs.
  • The Writers’/Directors’ Guide revision of March 23, 1987 confirms that warp 1 remains the speed of light and accepts warp 10 as ” the physical limit of the universe – beyond that normal time-space relationships do not exist and a ship at that velocity may simply cease to exist,

” As in the classic series, warp 6 is the highest cruising speed, though the stated equivalent of a light year per hour is more in keeping with,73 in the format of 1964 than the 41-hour light year by the cubed scale, or the 22 hours it would take to traverse the distance in the final revision.

  • At this early version of warp 6, however, the Enterprise would need 308 years to travel the 2,700,000 light years it covered in TNG : ” Where No One Has Gone Before “, consistent with Geordi La Forge’s “over three hundred years” in the episode.
  • By the creation of Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual, the warp factor scale used by Starfleet in the 24th century was based on a recalibration of the scale used in the Original Series,

Rather than a simple geometric progression based on relative speed, warp factors were established to be based upon the amount of power required to transition from one warp plateau to another. For example, the power to initially get to warp factor 1 was much more than the power required to maintain it; likewise warp 2, 3, 4, and so on.

  1. Those transitional power points rather than observed speed were then assigned the integer warp factors.
  2. These transitional points were established to apply to the original warp scale as well in the canonical warp chart presented in “First Flight”.
  3. According to an article in Star Trek: The Magazine Volume 1, Issue 6, p.44 by André Bormanis, this scale change occurred in 2312,

A term was added to the above equation that caused the speed to rise slightly at lower warp factor, but to become infinite at warp 10. The ratio v / c at a given warp factor is equal to the corresponding cochrane value that describes the subspace distortion. with

  • v being the speed of the signal or starship
  • c being the speed of light (3.0 × 10 8 m/s) and
  • wf being the resulting warp factor

Or, to calculate speed in terms of c (up to warp 9), the formula would be: In this case, warp 1 is equivalent to c (as it was in the 23rd century scale), but above warp 9 the speed increases exponentially, approaching infinity as the warp factor approaches 10. Using this scale:

Warp factor Calculated speed ( c ) Distance traveled in 24 hours (light years) Travel time from Earth to Alpha Centauri
0.5 0.09921256575 0.0002718152486 43.64366517 years
1 1 0.002739726027 4.33 years
2 10.0793684 0.02761470794 156.8004995 days
3 38.9407384 0.1066869545 40.58603059 days
4 101.5936673 0.2783388146 15.55657987 days
5 213.7469933 0.5856082009 7.394022135 days
6 392.4980481 1.075337118 4.026644229 days
7 656.1353957 1.797631221 2.40872541 days
8 1024 2.805479452 37.07 hours
9 1516.381107 4.154468786 25.03 hours
10 0

Is there an Enterprise H?

Construction and launch – The Enterprise -H was originally the USS Endurance (NX-90000). After the loss of the USS Enterprise -G, the Endurance was renamed Enterprise, The Enterprise -H was launched in 2420 as a replacement for the Excalibur -class USS Enterprise -G, which had been taken by Separatist forces some months earlier.

Where does HMS stand for?

HMS is used before the names of ships in the British Royal Navy. HMS is an abbreviation for ‘ Her Majesty’s Ship ‘ or ‘His Majesty’s Ship’.

What is the most powerful version of the USS Enterprise?

3 THE ENTERPRISE-E – What Does Ncc Stand For In Star Trek As cool as the Enterprise-D was, it couldn’t last forever and after its destruction, it was replaced with a new ship in the Sovereign-class Enterprise-E, We see this ship for several movies, and that lets it firmly establish itself as the strongest Enterprise in this particular timeline and reality.

What is the best USS Enterprise model?

3 NCC-1701 (Star Trek: The Original Series) – What Does Ncc Stand For In Star Trek The first is usually the best, and in many ways, the original Enterprise from the 1966 series remains the most iconic design in science-fiction. It’s hard to argue with its basic simplicity and instantly recognizable silhouette. Due to budgetary constraints, the original model of the ship lacked the detail that later versions did, but it’s still an incredible work of art.

How powerful is the USS Enterprise Star Trek?

Alternate future – NCC-1701-D refit Registry: USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D) Class: Galaxy refit Service: circa 2395 Captain: Full Admiral William T. Riker ( Jonathan Frakes ) In ” All Good Things. “, the final episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation, Enterprise -D was shown in an alternate future where it had not crashed during the events of Star Trek Generations, and instead had been made Admiral William T. NCC-1701-J Registry: USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-J) Class: Universe Service: 26th century The ” Azati Prime ” episode of Star Trek: Enterprise involves time travel and features a scene in which Enterprise -J appears. Enterprise -J operates in a possible timeline during the 26th century.

You might be interested:  What Does Rs'' Mean On Snapchat?

What is the biggest Enterprise in Star Trek?

Alternate timeline (covers information from Vanguard universe ) Created by a registered user this article was thought of and created by Maximus

Invincible -class
What Does Ncc Stand For In Star Trek
Side view
Class: Invincible
Type: Fleet Carrier – Command Battleship
Affiliation: Federation, Starfleet
Status: Active
Career
Launched: 2384
Commissioned: 2385
Dimensions
Length: 1,607.2 meters
Beam: 764.4 meters
Draft: 305.76 meters
Specifications
Decks: 60 + 6
Complement: Total: 4,000 (800 officers, 3,200 enlisted) Ship crew: 3,200 (640 officers, 2,560 enlisted) Fighter crew: 800 (160 officers, 640 enlisted)
Speed: Warp 8.5 (cruising) Warp 9.975 ( enhanced warp drive ) quantum slipstream drive
Armament: Phasers: 24 Type-XII Phaser Arrays 12 Type-XII forward triple-mounted pulse phaser cannons 12 Type-XII rotary triple-mounted pulse phaser turrets Torpedo launchers: 18 torpedo launchers (5-tube; 12 forward, 6 aft) 18 micro-torpedo phalanx array (9 starboard, 9 port) Torpedo payload: 750 quantum torpedoes 1,500 high-yield photon torpedoes ; 3,600 quantum micro-torpedoes
Defenses: Regenerative, redundant and multiphasic shielding Ablative hull armor Regenerative ablative armor plating (multiple generators)
Shuttlecraft: Fighters: 144 Valkyrie -class Advanced Tactical Fighters Auxiliary crafts: 8 Danube -class Runabouts 8 Delta Flyer III -class Runabouts 12 Type-11 shuttlecrafts 12 Type-9 shuttlecrafts
What Does Ncc Stand For In Star Trek
Top view

The Invincible -class is the single largest multi-mission combat-equipped starship ever constructed by Starfleet, She is designed as the ultimate in front line explorers. She is classified as a Fleet Carrier – Command Battleship, Invincible -class ships combine the roles of battleship and fighter carrier, having a massive offensive capability in terms of on-board weapons and huge complement of tactical fighters.

Is there an enterprise F?

Star Trek: Picard – The USS Enterprise NCC-1701-F The Enterprise-F has made her appearance in the ninth episode of Star Trek: Picard, This continues the trend of starships bearing the name Enterprise in the Star Trek universe. While it was hinted that the Enterprise-F would be appearing in this series, just exactly how, when, and why was unknown. What Does Ncc Stand For In Star Trek Admiral Picard on the bridge of the USS Titan – Star Trek: Picard

Is there an Enterprise Z?

The Final Enterprise – The USS Enterprise-Z “The greatest fear a member of Starfleet should ever have is the fear that we will run out of stars to trek among.” -Clazorus Vissyr Kazove The Enterprise-Z was launched during a time of great difference in comparison to the original ship to bear the name.

What Enterprise is in Picard?

Meet the Enterprise-G – The Newest Ship to Bear the Name Enterprise as Seen in ‘Star Trek: Picard’ Star Trek fans have now been able to see the final episode of the final season of Star Trek: Picard. With the conclusion of this series came the introduction of a new ship that bears the name Enterprise.

What happened to USS Enterprise-F?

Apocrypha – The Star Trek: Picard Logs had it stated that the Enterprise -F was launched in 2386, and had been commanded by several captains over the course of her fifteen years in service. The ship’s critical systems were severely compromised during the Monfette Gambit ( β ), a rescue effort for Raillian refugees on Fenton IV ( β ). The USS Enterprise -F as depicted in Star Trek Online and as such in the 2022 Ships of the Line calendar The Odyssey -class USS Enterprise -F ( β ) is featured in Star Trek Online (in which the ship had originally been introduced in the first place, already in 2012) as the new Federation flagship and was by 2409 commanded by the aforementioned Andorian Captain Va’Kel Shon.

  1. She is first encountered by the player in 2409, defending Deep Space 9 from a Jem’Hadar attack.
  2. In the Online universe, the ship was refitted in 2410 into a Yorktown -class ( β ) vessel after having sustained further critical damage during a later conflict.
  3. On its September spread of the 2022 Ships of the Line calendar, the (refit-)USS Enterprise -F is seen defending Deep Space 9 again, against the Hur’q this time – or rather against their servants, the Drantzuli ( β ), as was established in Star Trek Online,

According to the novel Imzadi, an Enterprise -F commanded by Data in 2408 during an alternate future was encountered by the crew of the Enterprise -D. In the alternate timeline from the DS9 book trilogy Millennium, following the destruction of the USS Enterprise -E, Starfleet launched the Enterprise -class ( β ) USS Enterprise -F ( β ), which Thomas Riker described as being like the USS Defiant to the tenth power.

  • The ship was originally commanded by Jean-Luc Picard, but was given over to William T.
  • Riker after Picard’s promotion to admiral.
  • Among Riker’s crew were Geordi La Forge, Deanna Troi, Tom Paris, and B’Elanna Torres,
  • The Enterprise -F was lost with all hands in a horrific battle that saw the destruction of Earth.

This timeline was aborted thanks to the efforts of Benjamin Sisko and the rest of Deep Space 9 ‘s crew.

Why is the Enterprise-D in picard?

The Enterprise-D, reborn – The Enterprise-D leaves the Fleet Museum in “Vox.” Paramount+ In Episode 6 of Picard Season 3, Alandra La Forge (Mica Burton) hinted that her father Geordi (LeVar Burton) was hiding something in docking bay 12 of the Fleet Museum.

In Episode 9, Geordi reveals that it’s a fully restored version of the Enterprise-D ! Picard asks, pointedly, “But how?” And Geordi reveals that Starfleet removed the crashed saucer section of the Enterprise-D from the surface of Verdian III in accordance with the Prime Directive (that famous Star Trek rule that says Starfleet can’t unduly influence cultures who haven’t yet developed interstellar travel on their own).

So, basically, even though Verdian III was uninhabited, the crashed ship was removed so as to “not influence the system.” In Generations, Data said the neighboring planet, Verdian IV, had a “pre-industrial society.” Meaning that just the presence of advanced technology from Starfleet in a burgeoning star system was enough to yank the ship, which actually makes a lot of sense.

It’s sort of like if an advanced alien race crashed a ship on the Moon during the Stone Age and then decided to yank it to prevent humans from finding it in the future.) The crashed saucer of the Enterprise-D in Generations, Paramount Since the saucer was only half of the Enterprise-D, Geordi tells the crew he’s been restoring the ship bit-by-bit for the past twenty years.

This means that roughly since the end of Nemesis in 2379, Geordi has been, secretly, putting the pieces of the Enterprise-D back together. He reveals that this includes getting the “engines and nacelles from the USS Syracuse. This detail means the entire drive section (or engineering section) of this restored Enterprise-D actually came from a different Galaxy-class ship from which Geordi salvaged for parts.

Is warp 10 infinite speed?

Star Trek – A representation of a Star Trek “warp bubble” Warp drive is one of the fundamental features of the Star Trek franchise and one of the best-known examples of space warp (warp drive) in fiction. In the first pilot episode of Star Trek: The Original Series, ” The Cage “, it is referred to as a “hyperdrive”, with Captain Pike stating the speed to reach planet Talos IV as “time warp, factor 7”.

  • The warp drive in Star Trek is one of the most detailed fictional technologies there is.
  • Compared to the hyperspace drives of other fictional universes, it differs in that a spaceship does not leave the normal space-time continuum and instead the space-time itself is distorted, as is made possible in the general theory of relativity,

The basic functional principle of the warp drive in Star Trek is the same for all spaceships. A strong energy source, usually a so-called warp core or sometimes called intermix chamber, generates a high-energy plasma, This plasma is transported to the so-called warp field generators via lines that are reminiscent of pipes.

These generators are basically coils in warp nacelles protruding from the spaceship. These generate a subspace field, the so-called warp field or a warp bubble, which distort space-time and propels the bubble and spaceship in the bubble forward. The warp core can be designed in various forms. Humans and most of the other fictional races use a moderated reaction of antideuterium and deuterium,

The energy produced passes through a matrix, which is made of a fictional chemical element, called dilithium, However, other species are shown to use different methods for faster-than-light propulsion. The Romulans, for example, use artificial micro-black holes called quantum singularities,

  1. The speeds are given in warp factors and follow a Geometric progression,
  2. The first scale developed by Franz Joseph was simply a cubic progression with no limit.
  3. This leads to the use of ever growing warp factors in the Original Series and the Animated Series,
  4. For example, warp 14.1 in the TOS-episode ” That Which Survives ” or warp 36 in the TAS-episode ” The Counter-Clock Incident “.

In order to focus more on the story and away from the technobabble, Gene Roddenberry commissioned Michael Okuda to invent a revised warp scale. Warp 10 should be the absolute limit and stand for infinite speed. In homage to Gene Roddenberry, this limit was also called “Eugene’s Limit”.

  • Okuda explains this in an author’s comment in his technical manual for the USS Enterprise -D.
  • Between Warp 1 (the speed of light ) and Warp 9, the increase was still roughly geometric, but the exponent was adjusted so that the speeds were higher compared to the old scale.
  • For instance, Warp 9 is more than 1500 times faster than Warp 1 in comparison to the 729 times (nine to the power of 3) calculated using the original cubic formula.

In the same author’s comment, Okuda explains that the motivation was to fulfill fan expectations that the new Enterprise is much faster than the original, but without changing the warp factor numbers. Between Warp 9 and Warp 10, the new scale grows exponentially,

Only in a single episode of Star Trek Voyager there was a specific numerical speed value given for a warp factor. In the episode ” The 37’s “, Tom Paris tells Amelia Earhart that Warp 9.9 is about 4 billion miles per second (using customary units for the character’s benefit). That is more than 14 times the value of Warp 9 and equal to around 21,400 times speed of light.

You might be interested:  What Does Soft Shoulder Sign Mean?

However, this statement contradicts the technical manuals and encyclopedias written by Rick Sternbach and Michael Okuda. There a speed of 3053 times the speed of light was established for a warp factor of 9.9 and a speed of 7912 times the speed of light for a warp factor of 9.99.

  • Both numerical values are well below the value given by Tom Paris.
  • In the episode ” Vis à Vis “, a coaxial warp drive is mentioned.
  • The working principle is explained in more detail in the Star Trek Encyclopedia,
  • This variant of a warp drive uses spatial folding instead of a warp field and allows an instant movement with nearly infinite velocity.

Star Trek has also introduced a so-called Transwarp concept, but without a fixed definition. It is effectively a catch-all phrase for any and all technologies and natural phenomena that enable speeds above Warp 9.99. Rick Sternbach described the basic idea in the Technical Manual: “Finally, we had to provide some loophole for various powerful aliens like Q, who have a knack for tossing the ship million of light years in the time of a commercial break.

How fast was warp 5?

Specifications – Main console of the reactor The warp factor chart of the warp five engine The warp fields of warp five ships The engine was officially called a gravimetric field displacement manifold. ( ENT : ” Cold Front “) The reactor had eight major components. ( ENT : ” Desert Crossing “) Magnetic constrictors were used to align the positron stream to the dilithium matrix,

  • ENT : ” Cold Front “) The dilithium matrix had to be aligned to within 0.3 microns,
  • In the warp matrix, antimatter flow regulators controlled the plasma pressure in the intermix chamber,
  • ENT : ” Affliction “) Another important component of the reactor was the primary warp coil,
  • ENT : ” Damage “) When the reactor was restarted from an off-line state, the reactor output had to be confined to within 300 and 312 millicochranes to prevent fusion of the dilithium matrix, unless the spatial compression index was greater than 5.62 percent, or the ship was within two parsecs of a class C gravimetric field distortion.

( ENT : ” Doctor’s Orders “) If the antimatter flow regulators were locked open, plasma pressure within the chamber would rise, threatening to destroy the ship. In order to reduce the pressure, the ship had to maintain high warp until the damage was repaired.

  1. Such an event occurred in November 2154, due to Klingon sabotage of Enterprise NX-01,
  2. Moments before the engine was shut down and cold started, intermix pressure had risen to 1527 and the field variance had risen to eighty-seven millicochranes.
  3. ENT : ” Affliction “) Even when the warp five engine was newly introduced and the only one in Starfleet was being used by Enterprise NX-01, warp five engines were expected to be installed in the next generation of freighters,

( ENT : ” Fortunate Son “) In the first draft script of “Fortunate Son”, Trip Tucker speculated, ” In ten years, half the ships in the fleet will have them. ” In the original configuration, warp factor five was the maximum speed that could be maintained by a ship using the warp five engine for fifty-three minutes only.

  1. This speed was first tested in 2152,
  2. ENT : ” Fallen Hero “) By 2153, warp five had become a sustainable cruising velocity that could be maintained for long periods of time.
  3. The speed of warp five corresponded roughly to a velocity of 200 times the speed of light,
  4. ENT : ” The Expanse “, ” The Xindi “) In the episode ” The Expanse “, a location was given to Archer on where to go look for the Xindi inside the Delphic Expanse,

The location was stated to be a three month trip away from Earth at warp five. In the next episode, ” The Xindi “, when Enterprise had arrived to look for the Xindi in that region, it was said they were fifty light years away from Earth. This indicates warp five equals a speed of approximately 200 times the speed of light.

  • In the mirror universe, the warp five engine was used by the Terran Empire, though it was known to leak delta rays,
  • The radiation caused severe disfigurement to the engineers who worked on them.
  • It was said that, for every year an engineer spent next to one, he lost a decade of his life expectancy,

( ENT : ” In a Mirror, Darkly “)

How realistic is warp speed?

The bulk of scientific knowledge concludes that it’s impossible, especially when considering Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. There are certainly some credible concepts in scientific literature, however it’s too soon to know if they are viable.

What does NCC-1701-A stand for?

Forum:What does NCC and NX mean? – I was browsing Memory Alpha and it occured to me that I have no idea what NCC or NX means. Can someone explain this please? – 69.3.180.1 23:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC) It has never been canonically established what the letters stand for, but in the 23rd and 24th centuries, ” NX ” (not to be confused with NX-class ) was used to designate experimental or prototype starships (which were not commissioned as part of the actual fleet) while NCC designated commissioned vessels.

  1. As to what the letters actually meant, we can only speculate; I personally think they’re for non- English terms – perhaps Roman, Greek, or even Vulcan,
  2. But that’s just my guess.
  3. From Andoria with Love 23:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC) I believe that NX is an acronym for “Naval Experiment” and NCC is “Naval Construction Contract.” That, at least, is how acronymfinder.com defines them.

As far as specific Star Trek canon, I cannot speak to that. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.219.209.162 ( talk ). I think ‘Navel Experiment’ sounds like it could be right, but perhaps NCC stands for ‘Navel Commissioned Craft’ – SpinelessMonkey 20:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC) I have also seen “Naval Construction Contract” for NCC as well, I’d swear in (admittedly non-canon) Star Trek media.

Possibly the Next Gen Tech Manual? – umrguy42 20:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC) I’ve also read somewhere the term ‘Navigational Contact Code’, but I think it was in a novel (certainly not canon) – Mada101 18:14, 14 August 2007 (UTC) I always thought of NCC as “Naval Construction Code” – Quase 18:34, 16 October 2007 (UTC) For those of you curious as to the origin of “Naval Construction Code”, Mada101 is correct.

It comes from a Diane Carey novel entitled Star Trek: Best Destiny ( ISBN 0671795872 ) and features an “origin” story about James Kirk’s early years aboard the first USS Enterprise and his father, Commander George Kirk and Captain Robert April through a series of flashbacks.

  1. At the beginning of several different chapters, the novel sets the scene location by utilizing the ship’s name followed by the words “Naval Construction Contract 1701-A” or “Naval Experimental 2001” referring to a non-cannon starship USS Bill of Rights.
  2. From that novel, many acronym websites have decided to use that designation as hard canon fact, when we all know that most of the novels are not canon.

Especially with this new movie coming out in May.17:54 EST, 4 December 2008 N might simply mean “spacecraft”. NX seems to be a parallel of XF, used to designate an experimental fighter under the US Aerospace Vehicle Designation system, We have never seen a ship registered NY-xxxxx, but that might be a pre-production vessel.

  • The Hansen’s Raven in VOY has an NAR registry, which may be a civil version of NCC, whatever that means.- Indefatigable 23:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC) I would like to add one possible source for the NX designation.
  • The “Spirit of St.
  • Louis”, flown by Charles Lindbergh, bears the designation NX-211.
  • It seems to me that this would be a logical homage to a significant historic aircraft.

– The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.129.169.202 ( talk ).

What is the name of the NCC-1701?

Multiple realities (covers information from several alternate timelines ) For the United Earth Fleet ship, please see UEF Enterprise, ” Our mission? We explore. We seek out new life and new civilizations. We boldly go where no one has gone before. ” ” All I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by.

What was the original name of the NCC-1701-A?

Original timeline – Admiral James T. Kirk ( William Shatner ) orders the previous starship Enterprise to self-destruct to prevent its capture by Klingons in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1984). Kirk is demoted to captain and assigned command of a new USS Enterprise, NCC-1701-A, at the end of Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986).

Various licensed materials describe the ship’s history before its commissioning as Enterprise, such as it being re-named from USS Yorktown, USS Ti-Ho, or USS Atlantis, Although outwardly identical to the refitted original Enterprise first seen in Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979), the Enterprise -A is beset with problems during its shakedown cruise in Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989).

Despite these problems, the Enterprise is dispatched to rescue hostages on Nimbus III. Sybok ( Laurence Luckinbill ) and his followers hijack the ship and take it to a planet at the center of the galaxy, where Kirk and the crew regain control. Several novels and comics explore the six-year period between the fifth and sixth Star Trek films.

  1. In Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991), Enterprise is assigned to escort Klingon chancellor Gorkon ( David Warner ) to a peace summit on Earth.
  2. The renegade Klingon general Chang ( Christopher Plummer ), assisted by traitors aboard Enterprise, makes it appear the Enterprise fires on the chancellor’s vessel.

The Klingons take Kirk and Leonard McCoy ( DeForest Kelley ) prisoner; Spock and Enterprise crew disregard Starfleet orders and rescue them. Enterprise encounters and, with aid from Captain Sulu ( George Takei ) and the USS Excelsior, destroys Chang’s ship, and the crew protects the Federation president from an assassin.

What is the difference between NCC-1701 and 1701 A?

The original NCC-1701 was an older-style Constitution that was upgraded with more advanced components, whereas the NCC-1701-A was a brand-new, state-of-the-art vessel as of its launch. The two vessels appeared identical externally, and the dimensions and layout of both vessels matched up as well.