- 1 Why is it called dope?
- 2 Have the Sacklers been found guilty?
- 3 Why did sick become slang?
- 4 Is dope a rude word?
- 5 What exactly is dope?
- 6 Is Purdue Pharma real?
- 7 Are the Sacklers still billionaires?
- 8 Do the Sacklers still have immunity?
What is the slang sick dope?
What Is Dope Sick? – The term “dope sick” is slang for opiate withdrawal symptoms. People typically experience such symptoms when they detox from painkillers such as hydrocodone or oxycodone. However, some people use this term to refer to heroin withdrawal too.
What happened to people on Dopesick Love?
Where Are the Subjects of ‘Dope Sick Love’ Now? – Image Via HBO There are no credible sources to cite regarding the whereabouts of the two couples in the movie. Rumors continue to swirl as of 2021 saying that Tracy and Matt are still together and now have a seven-year-old daughter named Savannah together.
What is the slang for faking sick?
When you malinger, you pretend to be sick. If you ever claimed to have a stomach ache in order to stay home from school, you know what it means to malinger. The word malinger comes from the French malingre, which can mean ‘ailing or sickly,’ but its exact origin is uncertain.
Why is it called dope?n.1. Informal a. A narcotic, especially an addictive narcotic.b. Narcotics considered as a group.c. An illicit drug, especially marijuana.2. A narcotic preparation used to stimulate a racehorse.3. Informal A stupid person; a dolt.4. Informal Factual information, especially of a private nature.5. Chemistry An absorbent or adsorbent material used in certain manufacturing processes, such as the nitroglycerin used in making dynamite.6. A type of lacquer formerly used to protect, waterproof, and tauten the cloth surfaces of airplane wings.7. Chiefly Southern US A carbonated soft drink containing an extract of the kola nut and other flavorings.8. Lower Northern US Syrup or sweet sauce poured on ice cream.v. doped, dop·ing, dopes v. tr.1. Informal a. To administer a narcotic to: was doped up for the operation.b. To add a narcotic to: They doped his drink before robbing him.c. To administer a performance-enhancing substance to (an athlete).d. To subject (an athlete) to blood doping.2. Electronics To treat (a semiconductor) with a dopant.v. intr. Informal 1. To take narcotics or a performance-enhancing substance.2. To engage in blood doping. adj. Slang Excellent; outstanding. Phrasal Verb: dope out Informal 1. To discover or plan: “I just had to dope out a way to get there without getting caught” (Leslie Edgerton).2. To solve or decipher: dope out a puzzle. dop er n. Word History: The word dope originated in American English and is a borrowing of the Dutch word doop, “sauce.” (New York City was once a Dutch colony, New Amsterdam, and many words originally distinctive to American English, like boss and cookie, were borrowed from Dutch colonists in the region.) Throughout the 1800s, dope meant “gravy,” and in the North Midland United States, particularly Ohio, dope is still heard as the term for a topping for ice cream, such as chocolate syrup or fruit sauce. Also in the 1800s, the meaning of dope was extended to include various medicinal mixtures or syrups, including the syrups from which soda-fountain drinks like Coca-Cola were prepared. A continuation of this usage survives in the South, particularly in South Carolina, where dope refers to the carbonated soft drink that elsewhere in the United States is called cola. Dope was especially used of those medicinal preparations that produced a stupefying effect, and it even became a slang term for the dark, molasses-like form of opium that was smoked in opium dens. The common modern meanings of dope, “a narcotic substance” and “narcotics considered as a group,” developed from this use of the word.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition copyright ©2022 by HarperCollins Publishers. All rights reserved.
Is the story of Dopesick true?
Is Dopesick a true story? – Mostly. Hulu’s limited series is based in part on material from the nonfiction book Dopesick: Dealers, Doctors and the Drug Company that Addicted America by journalist Beth Macy, who has written extensively about the opioid crisis in Appalachia.
- As Macy was considering offers around Hollywood, executive producer Danny Strong had already set up his own opioid addiction project at 20th Television.
- They had a fateful meeting in Chicago, and decided to work together to add authenticity to Strong’s scripts.
- While developing the show, they did extensive research to give the series a feeling of authenticity.
They brought in people from small towns and with opioid abuse disorder. They consulted a doctor who had been addicted to OxyContin who revealed the horrors he suffered. “Because we were documenting the crimes of Purdue Pharma, the show needed to feel as real as possible,” Macy said.
- Anything that didn’t feel real wouldn’t fly.
- But Strong says several characters in Dopesick are fictionalized—their character arcs assembled from the stories of a few different people.
- When it comes to members of the Sackler family who own and control OxyContin manufacturer Purdue Pharma, the series takes a strong position.
They’re often shown as callous villains with little regard for patients who become addicted or communities devastated by the disease. Hulu’s Dopesick also portrays a law enforcement and regulatory system struggling to hold the Sacklers and Purdue Pharma accountable, overwhelmed by their financial, legal and lobbying resources.
The Sacklers, however, maintain they did nothing wrong. Brian Mann, NPR’s addiction correspondent, said the TV show streamlines the real-life story in ways that can make for more effective TV drama. “I think that a storyline like Dopesick in the somewhat fictionalized narrative can bring a kind of moral throughline that often feels pretty satisfying,” added Mann.
“I’ve been in West Virginia, Ohio, communities that have been devastated by this public health crisis and it seems unlikely that corporations or their leaders involved in the opioid business will be held accountable,” Mann added.
What did Sacklers do wrong?
Sacklers Directed Efforts to Mislead Public About OxyContin, Court Filing Claims (Published 2019) A filing in a Massachusetts lawsuit contains dozens of internal Purdue Pharma documents suggesting the family was far more involved than the company has long contended. Purdue Pharma’s headquarters in Stamford, Conn. The Sacklers, who own Purdue Pharma, became one of the wealthiest families in the United States in part because of sales of OxyContin. Credit. George Etheredge for The New York Times Members of the Sackler family, which owns the company that makes, directed years of efforts to mislead doctors and patients about the dangers of the powerful opioid painkiller, a court filing citing previously undisclosed documents contends.
When evidence of growing abuse of the drug became clear in the early 2000s, one of them, Richard Sackler, advised pushing blame onto people who had become addicted. “We have to hammer on abusers in every way possible,” Mr. Sackler wrote in an email in 2001, when he was president of the company,, “They are the culprits and the problem.
They are reckless criminals.” That email and other internal Purdue communications are cited by the attorney general of Massachusetts in a new court filing against the company, released on Tuesday. They represent the first evidence that appears to tie the Sacklers to specific decisions made by the company about the marketing of OxyContin.
The aggressive promotion of the drug helped ignite the opioid epidemic. The filing contends that Mr. Sackler, a son of a Purdue Pharma founder, urged that sales representatives advise doctors to prescribe the highest dosage of the powerful opioid painkiller because it was the most profitable. Since OxyContin came on the market in 1996, people have died in the United States from overdoses involving prescription opioids, and Purdue Pharma has been the target of numerous lawsuits.
For years, Purdue Pharma has sought to depict the Sackler family as removed from the day-to-day operations of the company. The Sacklers, whose name adorns museums and medical schools around the world, are one of the richest families in the United States, with much of their wealth derived from sales of OxyContin.
- Disclosure of the documents is likely to renew calls for institutions to decline their philanthropic gifts.
- In a statement, Purdue Pharma, which is based in Stamford, Conn., rejected suggestions of wrongdoing by the company or members of the Sackler family, describing the court filing as “littered with biases and inaccurate characterizations.” The statement said the company was working to curtail the use and misuse of prescription painkillers.
Asked for a response from Richard Sackler and other members of the Sackler family, a Purdue Pharma spokesman, Robert Josephson, said that the company had no additional comment.312 pages, 4.81 MB In 2007, the company and three of its top executives pleaded guilty to federal criminal charges that Purdue had misrepresented the dangers of OxyContin, and they paid $634.5 million in fines.
- The Sacklers were not accused of any wrongdoing and have not faced personal legal consequences over the drug.
- But last June, Maura Healey, the Massachusetts attorney general, sued eight members of the Sackler family, along with the company and numerous executives and directors, alleging that they had misled doctors and patients about OxyContin’s risks.
The suit also claimed that the company aggressively promoted the drug to doctors who were big prescribers of opioids, including physicians who later lost their licenses. The court filing released on Tuesday also asserts that Sackler family members were aware that Purdue Pharma repeatedly failed to alert authorities to scores of reports the company had received that OxyContin was being abused and sold on the street.
- The company also used pharmacy discount cards to increase OxyContin’s sales and Richard Sackler, who served as Purdue Pharma’s president from 1999 to 2003, led a company strategy of blaming abuse of the drug on addicts, the suit claimed.
- In 1995, when the Food and Drug Administration approved OxyContin, it allowed Purdue Pharma to claim that the opioid’s long-acting formulation was “believed to reduce” its appeal to drug abusers compared with traditional painkillers such as Percocet and Vicodin.
At a gathering shortly afterward to celebrate the drug’s launch, Mr. Sackler boasted that “the launch of OxyContin tablets will be followed by a blizzard of prescriptions that will bury the competition. The prescription blizzard will be so deep, dense, and white,” according to a document cited in the legal complaint.
- Company sales representatives told doctors that OxyContin couldn’t be abused and were trained to say that the drug had an addiction risk for patients of “less than one percent,” a claim that had no scientific backing.
- Within a few years, Purdue Pharma was selling more than $1 billion worth of OxyContin annually.
But abuse of the drug quickly grew as teenagers and others discovered that all they needed to do was to crush OxyContin to get access to large amounts of a pure narcotic, oxycodone, contained in the pills. Family and friends of people who died of opioid overdoses, protesting outside Purdue Pharma in 2018.
Credit. Jessica Hill/Associated Press The court filing depicts Richard Sackler both as a principal force behind OxyContin’s promotion and the company’s efforts to dismiss growing reports about the drug’s abuse in the early 2000s. For instance, when a federal prosecutor reported in 2001 that there had been 59 overdose deaths involving OxyContin in his state alone, Mr.
Sackler appeared to make light of the problem, a document cited in the court filing suggests. “This is not too bad,” he wrote to the company officials. “It could have been far worse.” As part of the 2007 settlement agreement, the board of Purdue Pharma, which included members of the Sackler family, signed a corporate integrity agreement with the federal government promising that the company would not violate the law in the future.
However, Ms. Healey asserted in her lawsuit filed last year that Purdue Pharma, with the knowledge of the Sacklers, continued to illegally market the drug, including promoting its use at levels that increased the drug’s dangers. Also, while Richard Sackler and other members of the family had resigned their operating posts either before or after the 2007 settlement of the Justice Department lawsuit, they still continued to control the company and its decisions, the lawsuit claims.
In a 2012 email, one Purdue Pharma sales official complained about Richard Sackler’s micromanagement of the company’s sales and marketing activities.
“Anything you could do to reduce the direct contact of Richard into the organization is appreciated,” that official wrote.In its statement, Purdue Pharma said that federal officials in 2013 had reviewed the company’s performance under the five-year corporate integrity agreement and found it in complete compliance.Purdue Pharma, first known as Purdue Frederick, was founded in 1952 by three brothers, Arthur, Mortimer and Raymond Sackler, all physicians who left medicine to pursue careers in the drug business.
When Arthur Sackler died in 1987, his two younger brothers, Mortimer and Raymond Sackler, purchased his stake in the company. They both died more recently. In 2016, Forbes magazine estimated the family’s wealth at about $13 billion. However, the precise figure is unknown because Purdue Pharma is privately held.
- A confidential 2006 prepared in connection with the federal government’s case against Purdue Pharma concluded that the drug maker was aware of OxyContin’s growing abuse soon after it came onto the market in 1996.
- That document also cited internal Purdue Pharma documents and emails that indicated members of the Sackler family had received reports about the abuse of OxyContin and another long-acting narcotic painkiller, MS Contin, sold by Purdue Pharma.
The memorandum, however, did not suggest any wrongdoing by members of the Sackler family., a former reporter for The New York Times, is the author of “Pain Killer: An Empire of Deceit and the Origin of America’s Opioid Epidemic” and “Missing Man: The American Spy Who Disappeared in Iran.” A version of this article appears in print on, Section B, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: Owners Tied To Plan to Hide OxyContin Risk,
Have the Sacklers been found guilty?
Image source, Reuters Image caption, State and local governments say OxyContin triggered an opioid epidemic The billionaire owners of Purdue Pharma will be protected from lawsuits linked to the US opioid crisis in exchange for a $6bn (£4.85bn) settlement.
Purdue, which filed for bankruptcy in 2019 amid thousands of lawsuits, made drugs like OxyContin and is blamed for fuelling the crisis. On Tuesday, an appeals court ruled that its owners, the Sackler family, would receive full immunity from civil suits. In exchange, they will pay $6bn to help address opioid addiction.
A 2021 investigation by the US House Oversight Committee indicated that members of the family, “who have owned a controlling share of Purdue Pharma since 1952, are collectively worth a total of $11bn”. The family have long demanded civil immunity, and the court’s ruling removes a key barrier to the money being paid out.
The payments will be spread over multiple years. Funds will go to local and state governments and is expected to fund rehabilitation programmes and other addiction treatments. Roughly $750m of the settlement will be distributed to individual victims of the opioid crisis and their families. A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued the ruling.
The details of the settlement have been contested in the courts for several years. Judge Eunice Lee said the claims filed against Purdue Pharma were inextricably linked to the Sackler family. She ruled that if lawsuits were permitted to continue targeting them, Purdue Pharma would not be able to reach a bankruptcy deal.
- The ruling paves the way for the settlement which must now receive final approval from a court.
- While it protects the family from any future civil cases, it does not protect them from potential criminal charges.
- As a part of the settlement the Sackler family will give up ownership of the company, which will be rebranded as Knoa, and send its profits to a fund to help treat addiction.
The family has been made to listen to stories of those impacted by the drug as part of the deal. Many of the complainants were state and local governments who alleged OxyContin triggered an opioid epidemic. The family will also allow their name to be removed from buildings and scholarships.
- Some organisations have already, including the Solomon R Guggenheim Museum in New York, which last year removed the family name from an arts education centre, and the Louvre in Paris, which removed it from a 12-room wing following protests led by US photographer and activist Nan Goldin.
- Media caption, The heroin-ravaged city fighting back In 2021, there were more than 100,000 overdose deaths in the US, with opioids involved in 75% of those according to the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.
Purdue Pharma promoted opioids as non-addictive painkillers, and the company has previously pleaded guilty to charges relating to its opioid marketing. The Sackler family has denied wrongdoing. The families of now-deceased Mortimer and Raymond Sackler, the two founders of Purdue Pharma, welcomed Tuesday’s decision.
What is the British slang for sick people?
20 British slang words and phrases for socializing and nightlife –
- Pissed – A British term for being very drunk.
- Bangers – A slang word for good music.
- Bladdered – Another term for being drunk.
- Cheeky Nando’s – Going to the popular British chain restaurant Nando’s with friends.
- Gaff – A British term for someone’s house or apartment.
- Gutted – Feeling disappointed or let down.
- Fiver – A five-pound note.
- Goss – Short for gossip.
- Knackered – Tired or exhausted.
- Lurgy – A British term for being sick.
- Mates – Friends.
- Natter – A chat or conversation.
- Absolutely Knackered – Super tired.
- Peckish – Slightly hungry.
- Quids – Slang for the British pound.
- Razzle-dazzle – Something that is exciting or impressive.
- Skint – Being broke or without money.
- Take the mickey – Making fun of someone.
- Uni – Short for university or college.
- Wanker – A derogatory term for someone who is disliked.
These 20 British slang terms and phrases for socializing and nightlife offer a glimpse into the unique vocabulary and culture of the people of UK. By using these slang terms, you can immerse yourself in British English and feel more at home in the country.
What is the British slang for sick day?
Throw a sickie to say to your employer that you are ill when you are not so that you do not have to go to your place of work for a day: I just didn’t feel like work so I threw a sickie.
Why did sick become slang?
When Alice Cooper killed a chicken (the chicken didn’t actually die) on stage, outsiders and parents thought it was sickening, but the audience found it cool, and so fans of the rock scene adopted/coined the term ‘sick’ meaning ‘wild’, ‘cool’, ‘awesome’ – later to be included in more mainstream language.
Is dope a rude word?
How to talk with your child about use of the Dope slang word – If you see the slang term dope in your teenager’s messages, you should definitely investigate further. Frequently this slang expression is used in a harmless manner as a positive slang term; however, it sometimes refers to drugs. Here are some suggestions for talking with your kid about the slang word dope :
Besides dope, I know that poison is a slang term for drugs. Why do you think some teenagers are willing to ingest a substance that literally poisons their body? Do your coaches every discuss formally or informally the consequences of taking drugs for performance enhancement? Let’s watch the documentary Bigger, Stronger, Faster about body-building brothers and steroids. When something is really great, which slang term do you and your friends use, dope or fire ?
What exactly is dope?
: an illicit drug (such as heroin or cocaine) used for its intoxicating or euphoric effects. especially : marijuana. smoking dope.b. : a preparation (such as an anabolic steroid, diuretic, or tranquilizer) given to a racehorse to help or hinder its performance.
Do people still say dope?
So it’s definitely still in use. It’s used as an adjective to mean cool, awesome, great.
Is OxyContin still a problem?
Sacklers Sacked But Purdue Still Caused Opioid Epidemic The role of Purdue Pharma and its blockbuster drug oxycontin in causing the opioid epidemic which has killed over 450,000 people in the past two decades has been well described in books like “The Empire of Pain” by author Patrick Keefe and in reports of investigative journalists that have appeared in leading U.S.
newspapers. From these and other sources it is estimated that in nearly one half of the cases drug addiction began with a doctor’s prescription. Although other drug companies and drug distributors were involved, Purdue with its blockbuster drug oxycontin was the leading supplier of prescription opioids to patients.
Purdue used “thought leaders” in medicine like Russell Portenoy, MD, Chairman of the Department of Pain Medicine and Palliative Care at Beth Israel Hospital in New York, to promote the safety of opioids. Purdue and other pharmaceutical companies paid large sums of money to Portenoy and his department.
Purdue also paid many other physicians to tout the benefits of oxycontin. Purdue also instructed its pharmaceutical representatives all over the country to tell physicians that oxycontin was not addictive primarily because of its slow-release properties. Purdue told its representatives to tell doctors that only persons with an “addictive personality” became addicts.
Contrary to the statements of Purdue recent evidence has shown that oxycontin is addictive and has played a significant role in the devastating epidemic of opioid addiction that has gripped the U.S. in recent years. Private parties and states attorneys general have sued Purdue.
- Purdue’s response was to opt for a settlement and declare bankruptcy.
- In the original bankruptcy proposal Purdue agreed to pay four billion dollars to plaintiffs.
- However, the Sackler family which privately owned Purdue, would be allowed to keep billions of dollars that it had withdrawn from the company before the bankruptcy was finalized.
In December 2021 a different judge, Coleen McMahon of the District Court for the Southern District Court of New York, ruled that the previous judge’s ruling on the settlement should not go forward because it released the Sackler family, the private owners of Purdue from liability.
- The Sackler family, she noted, had withdrawn more than 10 billion dollars from Purdue between 2008 and 2018 as the opioid epidemic was worsening.
- This money was mainly deposited in off-shore accounts and trusts that were not accessible to Americans.
- This is where the litigation stands today.
- All three of the original Sackler brothers who bought Purdue and ultimately developed oxycontin were physicians.
At the peak of their sales and marketing, Purdue hired 3,000 doctors to serve on their speakers bureau—a fact which certainly does not reflect well on the medical profession. Richard Sackler, the current chairman of the board of Purdue and who closely directed the firm in recent years, went to Harvard Business School—a fact which also does not reflect well on America’s premier business school.
- At Purdue, profits trumped ethics.
- The Sacklers were generous donors to universities, academic medical centers, museums, and other charitable institutions in the U.S.
- And all over the world.
- Their names adorned these venerable institutions.
- In almost every case their names have been removed.
- And with the new bankruptcy ruling the Sacklers will lose most of their vast fortune.
Far more important is their tragic legacy of being a major cause of the devastating opioid epidemic which has afflicted so many American families. : Sacklers Sacked But Purdue Still Caused Opioid Epidemic
Why are opioids addictive?
How opioid addiction occurs – Opioid use — even short term — can lead to addiction and, too often, overdose. Find out how short-term pain relief leads to life-threatening problems. By Mayo Clinic Staff Anyone who takes opioids is at risk of developing addiction.
- Your personal history and the length of time you use opioids play a role, but it’s impossible to predict who’s vulnerable to eventual dependence on and abuse of these drugs.
- Legal or illegal, stolen and shared, these drugs are responsible for the majority of overdose deaths in the U.S. today.
- Addiction is a condition in which something that started as pleasurable now feels like something you can’t live without.
Doctors define drug addiction as an irresistible craving for a drug, out-of-control and compulsive use of the drug, and continued use of the drug despite repeated, harmful consequences. Opioids are highly addictive, in large part because they activate powerful reward centers in your brain.
- Opioids trigger the release of endorphins, your brain’s feel-good neurotransmitters.
- Endorphins muffle your perception of pain and boost feelings of pleasure, creating a temporary but powerful sense of well-being.
- When an opioid dose wears off, you may find yourself wanting those good feelings back, as soon as possible.
This is the first milestone on the path toward potential addiction.
Is Purdue Pharma real?
History – The company that became Purdue Pharma was founded in 1892 by medical doctors John Purdue Gray and George Frederick Bingham in New York City as the Purdue Frederick Company. The company made a tonic compound made with sherry and glycerin. Sixty years later, in 1952, the company was sold to three other medical doctors, brothers Arthur, Raymond and Mortimer Sackler, who relocated the business to Yonkers, New York,
The brothers all held a one-third share in the company, but Arthur’s share passed to his brothers after his death in 1987. Mortimer died in 2010, followed by Raymond in 2017. Under the Sacklers, the company opened additional offices in New Jersey and Connecticut, The headquarters are located in Stamford, Connecticut,
The modern company, Purdue Pharma L.P., was incorporated in 1991 and focused on pain management medication, calling itself a “pioneer in developing medications for reducing pain, a principal cause of human suffering”. In 1984, its extended-release formulation of morphine, MS Contin was released.
OxyContin was released in 1996 after Curtis Wright, an employee of the Food and Drug Administration approved its use on a 12 hour dosage cycle. Around the time of OxyContin’s release, the American Pain Society introduced its “pain as fifth vital sign” campaign. Veterans Health Administration adopted the campaign as their national pain management strategy.
In September 2015, the company’s website said it had some 1,700 people on its payroll. That same month, the company announced it would acquire VM Pharma in the process gaining access to worldwide development and commercial rights to an allosteric selective tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitor program, i.e., the Phase II candidate VM-902A.
Are the Sacklers still billionaires?
In 2015, the Sackler family was the richest newcomer to Forbes list of America’s Richest Families, with a fortune conservatively estimated at $14 billion. Their wealth had been built from creating a controlled-release version of a World War I painkiller that their company Purdue Pharma began selling in 1996 under the brand name OxyContin.
Marketed aggressively as an addiction-proof remedy for a wide variety of aches and pains, OxyContin sales soared, as did addiction rates and overdose deaths among its users. So, too, did the number of lawsuits against Purdue and the Sacklers for their alleged roles in creating an opioid epidemic that has claimed more than 500,000 lives.
In 2019, Purdue announced a bankruptcy settlement that included $3 billion in cash from the Sacklers—allowing them to remain billionaires, That bankruptcy deal morphed to include a $6 billion payout from the family, which would have settled some 3,000 lawsuits and shielded the Sacklers from all future civil lawsuits,
Is Richard Sackler still wealthy?
How much is the Sackler family still worth? – Even after Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy, the family still has billions. In December 2020, taking into account the fines that the Sacklers have already paid out as settlements, estimates that the family (around 40 members) is worth about $10.8 billion.
Do the Sacklers still have immunity?
Key takeaways: –
A court ruling previously protected the Sackler family from opioid lawsuits in exchange for a $6 billion contribution to Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy plan. The Supreme Court blocked that deal Thursday.
The Supreme Court blocked Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy proceedings Thursday in a decision that also halts the deal granting immunity to the Sackler family. The Sackler family owned and operated Purdue Pharma, LLP, which manufactured OxyContin and marketed the drug with a misleading claim that the drug was less addictive, The Supreme Court blocked Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy proceedings Thursday in a decision that also halts the deal granting immunity to the Sackler family. Image: Adobe Stock The bankruptcy plan was overturned in a December 2021 ruling. Then, on May 30, a New York court of appeals reversed the December 2021 decision and ruled that members of the Sackler family will be protected from lawsuits over their role in the opioid epidemic.
- Now, the Supreme Court has paused the settlement, agreeing to take the case and hear arguments in the December 2023 argument session, according to reporting by Reuters.
- The new Supreme Court term starts in October.
- At issue, according to the Supreme Court, is “whether the Bankruptcy Code authorizes a court to approve, as part of a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, a release that extinguishes claims held by nondebtors against nondebtor third parties, without the claimants’ consent.” Purdue Pharma said in a statement it was disappointed that the U.S.
Trustee has been able to “single-handedly delay billions of dollars in value that should be put to use for victim compensation, opioid crisis abatement for communities across the country and overdose rescue medicines.” The company added that it is “confident in the legality of our nearly universally supported plan of reorganization, and optimistic that the Supreme Court will agree.”